For each animation we can ask ourselves (or even better: our users) whether it adds to the user experience or is just a fancy but unnecessary effect. The media query is called prefers-reduced-motion, not prefers-no-motion nor does-absolutely-not-want-any-motion. Removing them entirely may not be a good idea.
Removing animations or reducing animations?Īs said before, animations can improve the user experience.
Disable animate it css how to#
The Mozilla Developer Network has a list of how to activate this setting on various operating systems. In general, this is not a browser setting but a setting that you can activate on your device. Therefore, we do not want to remove animations in general but only for those users that prefer reduced motion.Īnd we can do exactly that with a media query called prefers-reduced-motion: (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) How to activate the reduced motion setting They can make a fine website a great one. However, animations are a good thing, as they can help the user processing the contents of a website better. Some users are troubled by motion (because they may have a vestibular motion disorder or are easily distracted).įor the last group, animations in a website can be a burden.So we use proper color palettes, high contrast and make the website scalable. Some users are visually impaired (because they are color blind or their vision is decreased).
So we make our websites accessible by multiple input devices such as mouse, touchscreen and keyboard.
For some users who are troubled by motion when looking at websites this means restricting or even removing animations. Interesting fact, by removing CSS animations we sped up by a couple of percents our test suite.When building websites we not only try to deliver a solid, tested and maintainable solution, we also always strive for a great user experience. off = true For The Same Price: Faster Tests You can fix this in the same fashion, by disabling fx in your test environment: $. Note that this issue can also happen because of JavaScript animations with jQuery. You could also change your logic to a simpler way of doing CSS3 animations. In this case waiting for the animation to be done seems like the way to go. To do so, you can include this into your code: * I’d recommend disabling CSS animations entirely in your test environment. … but that’s not great as it requires you to either change or slow down your tests. click sleep 1 # Or some kind of loop testing if the element is now visible find ( formxSelector ) … or wait until the element is visible … find ( buttonSelector ). You could solve the problem by doing this: find ( formxSelector, visible: false ) This is particularly annoying since the failure will be random, depending on the speed of the machine running the specs. If the animation is not done by the time step 3 runs, it can fail because Form X is not visible yet (by default Capybara doesn’t find hidden elements). Let’s say that step 2 triggers a CSS animation.
Disable animate it css code#
Once you have your tests running, you would expect your backend code or your javascript to break them. Personnally I like to use Capybara with PhantomJS/ Poltergeist and this post takes this stack as example, but other testing options will most likely have similar behavior. If you don’t have some kind of acceptance tests, you should probably add some.
0 kommentar(er)
